Twilight Wolf said:
Correction: the Wii Remote was great. It had amazing potential until developers began to see that hey, when you slap motion control on anything, people will eat it up. What did that produce? A library consisting of 95% shovelware that nobody in their right mind would pay for. Same thing with the DS and touch control, unfortunately.
Nowadays the Wii Remote isn't even that impressive technologically when you compare it to something like the PS Move. Not that I'd buy one of those, either, but still...
All lead consoles are full of shovelware, it is completely unrelated. Systems like the Wii, DS, and PS2 have great games on them, you just have to dig through all the crap first. Its just the downside of being the most popular console in a generation. Oh, and the PS Move isn't all that great btw. Of course it'll outperform 5+ year old tech like the original Wiimote, but something newer like Wii Motion Plus fairs much much better against it.
bic said:
(But of course if it gets a Blu-Ray drive it won't play Blu-Ray movies, because that would mean licensing codecs and that costs money. Same deal with streaming services like Netflix and Amazon VOD.)
I agree, they most likely won't offer blu-ray movie playback (they never sell consoles at a loss, partly by cutting things like this), but the Wii already has Netflix and the 3DS is getting it soon with a major update. I see no reason why this would change on their next console.
As for analog thumb sticks, I'm pretty sure Bush was referring to the fact that although Nintendo wasn't the first (just like touch screens, motion controls, 3D, built-in 4 player,etc.), they did play a large role in making them popular. Unfortunately, although other companies are quick to add these things after Nintendo, Nintendo has always been more hesitant to add features made popular by their competitors.
XCVG said:
There are netbooks more powerful than the 360 and PS3, so that's not saying much. The original XBOX could play games at HD resolutions (720p on VERY FEW titles). No doubt this will go the same way as the Wii. Take a "revolutionary" (underpowered) console, slap some casual shovelware on it, and push it into the non-gamer market with clever marketing. Then make a crapton of money and laugh at companies trying to push decent consoles while the really hardcore gamers migrate back to PC. The guy who said that the motion controller had squandered potential hit the nail right on the head. There's a very good reason why the gamepad as implemented today became standard. It's not very good for some types of games, but is okay for the vast majority of them. Motion control is great for some games and absolutely terrible for a lot. I expect this console to go the same way as the Wii. If you aren't either a non-gamer, little kid, or hardcore Nintendo fan, why bother? I won't be buying it. Still, it is nice seeing that at least the next generation is finally on its way.
The original Xbox didn't play those titles in
TRUE HD, so that's not entirely true. As for the shovelware, see what I said earlier, you can't blame Nintendo for that like it was their idea. You'd have to blame Sony for the PS2's shovelware too. And as much as I love PC gaming and how its been gaining ground and support again, it sounds really biased to say all the hardcore gamers are going to PC anyway. Even with the recent surge of PC support, a lot of "hardcore" gamers still use consoles, and it would take A LOT to change that. Besides, you can be a "hardcore" gamer on pretty much any console you want, its a subjective term. I'm also kinda hoping MS and Sony don't change plans because of this and push out their consoles sooner. This generation isn't like the last, and I'd really prefer if the 360/PS3 had a few more years without a successor. The Wii has needed one for a while now, but the 360/PS3 can still do fine for a bit longer.