N64 At its smallest.

Also we got the N64 board even smaller.
It gets smaller by the hour.
We are close to the point where you really can't make it smaller with out redesigning everything.

Credit for all of the tracing,testing, and trimming goes to βeta,ShockSlayer, and I BoFoSho.

We all did work, Now that SS is busy with his newest portable, βeta and I are going to be doing the Tracing,Testing, and Trimming.
 
Who cares?

You're making a home console smaller, I don't much care about it.

Sure, you can make one the size of a Credit Card.
But even if you did, I wouldn't *Can'tSayThisOnTV*ing want it, or a portable of it.
Put an N64 into a Gameboy Color I still wouldn't pay more than $30, so, *Can'tSayThisOnTV* it.
 
Jlee, stop Segaing about it, we are trimming it for fun not to hear how much you do not care about the system.
Don't post if you don't care.

Also a CGB N64 is possible
 
BoFoSho said:
Jlee, stop Segaing about it, we are trimming it for fun not to hear how much you do not care about the system.
Don't post if you don't care.

Also a CGB N64 is possible
 
BoFoSho said:
Also a CGB N64 is possible
Why?
I mean, the size is great, but the buttons would be so cramped and you would have to have such a tiny screen that it would be pointless.
 
Atari said:
BoFoSho said:
Also a CGB N64 is possible
Why?
I mean, the size is great, but the buttons would be so cramped and you would have to have such a tiny screen that it would be pointless.
They're just saying it as an example of the size.


Bo, Beta, you know we're just measuring dicks.
I don't care about portables.
I'm not here to say "Well I'm better than those cunts but hey whatever."
I'm saying "I could make a *Can'tSayThisOnTV*ing tiny one, but they're the only ones who'll actually take the time to do it."
 
An old n64 mobo that was trimmed(not as much as it an now), almost the size of a cgb.
DSC03007.jpg
 
this thread...wow..

Now why the *Can'tSayThisOnTV* can't we get this kind of attention in the GC section!?!?

Oh, and Beta, you seriously need to get a PS2 retrocon controller. The Joysticks arent the only treat, its also got built in tacts that have virtually no thickness on the controller board.
 
mako321 said:
An old n64 mobo that was trimmed(not as much as it an now), almost the size of a cgb.
DSC03007.jpg
It won't work though, will it?

I'm curious, how long has it taken you to learn how to do all this?
 
There are a couple of huge things you can trim off, and you're just missing them. I could fit it in a GBC, but it would be a pain.
 
βeta said:
There are a couple of huge things you can trim off, and you're just missing them. I could fit it in a GBC, but it would be a pain.
It's a pretty old pic, I've trimmed more. At that point though, it will already fit in a DMG.
 
Tchay said:
Now why the *PLINK* can't we get this kind of attention in the GC section!?!?
Because, the N64 is much more expendable than the Gamecube. Think, all of those fried N64s can be used for tracing, board scans, and theoretical cutting. Second, the N64 is dirt cheap. Third, it is much easier to trace than the Gamecube; the N64 has larger traces, and fewer of them too. The chips are simpler and you can solder to all of them (GC uses BGA for its processors). Fourth, the N64 is simple; it's two layered. You don't have to look out for hidden traces or voltage allocation. What you see is what you get. Every trace is right in front of you, and you don't have to ruin a perfectly good board to find them. Removing the chips are easier with ChipQuik. I could go on and on, but here's the honest truth: the N64 is commonplace. So are N64 portables. There are more N64 portables in the world than any other device. The Gamecube no such footing. And N64 portables are cheaper to make.

...That's all I can think of right now, get back to me later if you want more...
 
Atari said:
Tchay said:
Now why the *PLINK* can't we get this kind of attention in the GC section!?!?
Because, the N64 is much more expendable than the Gamecube. Think, all of those fried N64s can be used for tracing, board scans, and theoretical cutting. Second, the N64 is dirt cheap. Third, it is much easier to trace than the Gamecube; the N64 has larger traces, and fewer of them too. The chips are simpler and you can solder to all of them (GC uses BGA for its processors). Fourth, the N64 is simple; it's two layered. You don't have to look out for hidden traces or voltage allocation. What you see is what you get. Every trace is right in front of you, and you don't have to ruin a perfectly good board to find them. Removing the chips are easier with ChipQuik. I could go on and on, but here's the honest truth: the N64 is commonplace. So are N64 portables. There are more N64 portables in the world than any other device. The Gamecube no such footing. And N64 portables are cheaper to make.

...That's all I can think of right now, get back to me later if you want more...

It was rhetorical but thx anyway :p
 
Back
Top