DS lite alsoShockSlayer said:For the record, an n64p can fit inside an original DS with internal battery pack.
jleemero said:I already possess the knowledge to make one smaller than either SS or βeta currently believe is possible.
BoFoSho said:Jlee, stop Segaing about it, we are trimming it for fun not to hear how much you do not care about the system.
Don't post if you don't care.
Also a CGB N64 is possible
Why?BoFoSho said:Also a CGB N64 is possible
They're just saying it as an example of the size.Atari said:Why?BoFoSho said:Also a CGB N64 is possible
I mean, the size is great, but the buttons would be so cramped and you would have to have such a tiny screen that it would be pointless.
This makes sense.jleemero said:They're just saying it as an example of the size.
It won't work though, will it?mako321 said:An old n64 mobo that was trimmed(not as much as it an now), almost the size of a cgb.
It's a pretty old pic, I've trimmed more. At that point though, it will already fit in a DMG.βeta said:There are a couple of huge things you can trim off, and you're just missing them. I could fit it in a GBC, but it would be a pain.
Because, the N64 is much more expendable than the Gamecube. Think, all of those fried N64s can be used for tracing, board scans, and theoretical cutting. Second, the N64 is dirt cheap. Third, it is much easier to trace than the Gamecube; the N64 has larger traces, and fewer of them too. The chips are simpler and you can solder to all of them (GC uses BGA for its processors). Fourth, the N64 is simple; it's two layered. You don't have to look out for hidden traces or voltage allocation. What you see is what you get. Every trace is right in front of you, and you don't have to ruin a perfectly good board to find them. Removing the chips are easier with ChipQuik. I could go on and on, but here's the honest truth: the N64 is commonplace. So are N64 portables. There are more N64 portables in the world than any other device. The Gamecube no such footing. And N64 portables are cheaper to make.Tchay said:Now why the *PLINK* can't we get this kind of attention in the GC section!?!?
Atari said:Because, the N64 is much more expendable than the Gamecube. Think, all of those fried N64s can be used for tracing, board scans, and theoretical cutting. Second, the N64 is dirt cheap. Third, it is much easier to trace than the Gamecube; the N64 has larger traces, and fewer of them too. The chips are simpler and you can solder to all of them (GC uses BGA for its processors). Fourth, the N64 is simple; it's two layered. You don't have to look out for hidden traces or voltage allocation. What you see is what you get. Every trace is right in front of you, and you don't have to ruin a perfectly good board to find them. Removing the chips are easier with ChipQuik. I could go on and on, but here's the honest truth: the N64 is commonplace. So are N64 portables. There are more N64 portables in the world than any other device. The Gamecube no such footing. And N64 portables are cheaper to make.Tchay said:Now why the *PLINK* can't we get this kind of attention in the GC section!?!?
...That's all I can think of right now, get back to me later if you want more...