It's not enough to make a portable that works. If you like your ZN-45, good for you, I do too. If you used a ZN-45 because it was the easy way out, then your portable is probably nothing special. I have no place saying this because I have yet to finish a portable , but that's just my opinion.
With an internal cart-slot, its not too much bigger than it should be.
People make ZN-45 N64p's because they are good money-maker portables. Small enough to be "portable" (EG: "how'd joo maek it so much smaller than teh N64 orijinally wuz lolololol???!?1?"), big enough to be easy and quick as Heck to build.
Well, I used a ZN-40, and I needed a huge lump for batteries and a cart slot. I used really big batteries, though. With smaller batteries I could have made it quite a bit smaller.
It also allows for a ton of customization. I'm trying to use one with an internal cart slot, a memory pak slot, d-pad, L, and another feature I don't want to reveal just yet.
They are a bit large, but can fit a ton of systems. I think a slim ps2 might even fit. Mainly, it's the thickness that turns people away. But you can house so many systems, and the psone screen fits with minimal trimming. If it's the thickness that's bad, I'd just use a ZN-40.
Probably the only thing I don't like about them are the dips on the front that allow the cases to be stack-able. I've been rounding mine off with layers of ABS cement and now it's awesome. Rounded edges FTW! But I like the curves on the back edges. It lets the system sit up slightly.
I agree. But I only think that the ZN-45 would be comfortable if it were not as thick. About 3/4" of an inch thinner and it's near perfect. Or an inch.
personally, ive never beheld any of the ZN series in real life so i cant postulate an opinion. but i think they are overused. it seems weird to me that there are standards in something as non standard as portablizing.