samjc3
#1 Female Member
the other thread got locked due to immaturity. lets not have that happen here. i think its definitely something that should be talked about. after all, karma could be really cool. as is, its just another useless number.
IF THIS GETS OUT OF HAND AGAIN, I WILL BE DISSAPOINT.
My personal opinion is that the current karma system is too easy. it should be a smaller scale, say 10 to -10, and each user should only be allowed one opinion about each other user. and each opinion is factored into the users rating as 0.1 of a point.
so,for example, lets say im mad at T_W (<3 T_W). i can change my opinion of him to "dislike, and that drops his rating by 0.1.
if i like him, and set my opinion to "like" then his rating goes up 0.1
and if i dont care/dont know/meh him i can set it to "neutral" and my vote is removed from the equation altogether.
the beauty of this is that it bars from karma spamming, as each user can only have 1 opinion at a time about another user. and if someone gets pissed or something, they cant tan another users rating 8 or 10 points by sitting around all day.
IF THIS GETS OUT OF HAND AGAIN, I WILL BE DISSAPOINT.
My personal opinion is that the current karma system is too easy. it should be a smaller scale, say 10 to -10, and each user should only be allowed one opinion about each other user. and each opinion is factored into the users rating as 0.1 of a point.
so,for example, lets say im mad at T_W (<3 T_W). i can change my opinion of him to "dislike, and that drops his rating by 0.1.
if i like him, and set my opinion to "like" then his rating goes up 0.1
and if i dont care/dont know/meh him i can set it to "neutral" and my vote is removed from the equation altogether.
the beauty of this is that it bars from karma spamming, as each user can only have 1 opinion at a time about another user. and if someone gets pissed or something, they cant tan another users rating 8 or 10 points by sitting around all day.